Friday, June 14, 2013
Saturday, June 8, 2013
IMPORTANT CITIZEN INFORMATION AND ACTION TO SAVE RICHLAND CREEK
Position of the Richland Creek Watershed Alliance — Public Notice NRS12.236
Acronyms
TDEC – TN Dept of Environment & Conservation
WPC – Water Pollution Control
TWRA – TN Wildlife Resources Agency
ARAP – aquatic resource alteration permit
RCWA – Richland Creek Watershed Alliance
cfs – cubic feet per second
|
TDEC PUBLIC NOTICE #NRS12.236 — Metro Parks application for an aquatic resource
alteration permit
to authorize continued withdrawal of water from Richland Creek
for irrigation purposes in connection with the operation of its McCabe Park
Golf Course.
TDEC WPC Division determined, in accordance with Tennessee’s water quality standards that approval of the proposed activity will result in degradation.
Public Comment Period is May 28- June 28, 2013.
FIRST and NOW – Request from TDEC to hold a public hearing for ARAP application
(#NRS12.236) about water quality of Richland Creek. Put your request in
writing, and include permit number (NRS12.236), your name and your address, the
reason you believe a hearing is needed, and the water quality
issue you have interest-in or concern. Send
your request and/or comment to TDEC and address to:
Robert Baker
TDEC Division of Water Pollution Control, Natural Resources Section
7th Floor L & C Annex
401 Church Street
Nashville, TN 37243
|
If TDEC Commissioner holds a Public Hearing, citizens can ask questions
and/or share a water quality concern at the hearing and still submit comments up
to 10 days later.
_______________________________________________________________
RCWA
POSITION #1: A PUBLIC HEARING SHOULD BE HELD.
The
withdrawal of water from Richland Creek at McCabe Park has been under the
grandfathered-in provision for forty years without any public scrutiny. RCWA believes it is in the
pubic interest to hold a public hearing and requests a TDEC Public Hearing be
held to help better inform the public of water quality issues: whether
mitigation proposed under permit NRS12.236, if approved, would better support
the resources classified uses, and to better understand how Metro Parks’
proposed plan would improve or impact water quality.
RCWA
POSITION #2 - RCWA OPPOSES APPROVAL OF ARAP NRS12.236.
The proposed
activity has occurred since 1973, and caused cumulative impact, long-term harm,
loss of value to resource (Richland Creek), and degraded its habitat and
biological diversity (TWRA instream flow study - 2011). Applicant has not
presented any scientific study to show a greater value would result from the
proposed mitigation concept plan. Withdrawal of water from Richland Creek has
caused water pollution and prevented resource water quality standards to be
sustained (RCWA 2011 Dissolved Oxygen Study for McCabe Park). Cease of water withdrawal would allow
for removal of low head dam structure, necessary to operate activity, and
provide full recovery of resources’ classified uses (fish and aquatic life,
recreation). Use of larger
resource, the Cumberland River, for irrigation purposes through Metro Water
Services is feasible without loss of benefit, and enables long-term restoration
of the resource to begin that would provide more public benefit than the
mitigation proposed in the Metro Park permit application (NRS12.236). The RCWA 2011 Dissolved Oxygen Study
Report has been included with this public submission.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLARIFICATION OF RCWA POSITION - OPPOSE APPROVAL OF #NRS12.236:
1) Richland Creek is on the federal impaired list for water pollution.
According to Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, once a stream
has been placed on the impaired List, it is to be considered a priority
for water quality improvement. The activity at McCabe Park has been a major
contributor to Richland's poor water quality under the grandfathered-in
provision. In part, the immense water withdrawal (27 million gallons) annually
by Metro Parks reduces dilution factor and raises concentration of resource
pollutants and constituents caused by urban pollution. Now is the opportunity to provide sustained and measurable
water quality improvement to Richland Creek, through returning natural flow.
This resource is part of the hydrologic (water) cycle, and a contributor to
Cumberland River’s water quality. Improvement to water quality for this
resource would help enhance the quality of a regional drinking-water supply
(Cumberland River) that is a valuable public benefit and important community
resource. Approval of proposed activity would prolong 303(d) listing of Richland
Creek, and the mitigation plan presented does not present any scientific study
or information showing how measurable water quality improvement would occur.
2) To operate the water-use activity at McCabe Park a low-head dam, storage tank and impoundment is required. Discharge of urban run-off to creek,
its constituents and pollutants are stored behind dam, allowing for continual
and sustained mixing of non-point source pollution with freshwater flow of
resource. The lake-like environment, (impoundment) impairs water quality and
degrades stream habitat, enabling native species to become outnumbered by more
pollution-tolerant species (TWRA instream flow study 2011). Cumulatively
and collectively, the water-use activity and its structures have been a
contributor to water pollution, degradation to fish and aquatic habitat, and
cause lost diversity of native stream species. Permit approval would authorize sustained pollution and degradation of
Richland Creek. Richland Creek
discharge cannot continue to support irrigation of 27 million gallons annually
for McCabe Park Golf Course, and doing so would prohibit full support of the
resource’s designated uses, specifically the more stringent standard, fish and
aquatic life. Water withdrawal and its associated structures, required to
operate activity, would continue prolonged degradation and create condition for
sustained water pollution.
3) The low head dam at McCabe Park and
the water withdrawal from Richland Creek have caused two classified uses not to
be fully supported — fish and aquatic life, and recreation. General Water Quality Criteria, Chapter 1200-040-03 of
Tennessee Water Pollution Control Rules state since all Waters of the
State are classified for more than one use, the most stringent criteria will be
applicable; and in cases of protection for more than one use apply at different
stream flows, the most protective will also be applicable. The irrigation use is fully supported, but
the more stringent criterion of fish and aquatic life has not been supported
for many years. Support of fish and aquatic life use would provide
more recreational choices and benefit to the public, such as fishing, wildlife
watching, and paddling.
4) RCWA evaluated the dissolved oxygen levels of Richland Creek in
2011 at McCabe Park and found that 17% of all the dissolved oxygen results
collected during three 24-hour periods were below the 5.0 mg/L standard. The
diurnal fluctuations observed were presumed man-made and caused by the
water-use activity. The study suggested a more thorough scientific evaluation for McCabe Park is warranted for the study
area (impoundment and downstream from withdrawal point) for fish and aquatic
life criteria and to determine the adverse impacts caused by the continued
water withdrawal and its associated structures, which are required to operate
the activity. The RCWA 2011
Dissolved Oxygen Study Report is included with this public comment submission.
5) The Tennessee Antidegradation Statement requires that if waters
are impaired, no additional degradation may be allowed, but can be rendered de
minimis through in-system mitigation, or exempt if of short duration.
This water-use activity is not of short duration, and RCWA will not
interpret whether the continued activity as proposed is de minimis, but questions
the method used to determine magnitude of impact, what the discharge at McCabe
Park is, and how much water is safe to withdraw. The USGS stream gage at Charlotte Pike is two-miles downstream from the withdrawal point. The Charlotte
Pike stream gage should not be used because it is too far away and
receives flow from a branch that is close by that would skew interpretation of
discharge. Approximately 100 feet upstream from the USGS steam gage is the
confluence of the Neighborly Branch resource that contributes a measurable flow
to Richland Creek. Determining when to withdraw water from Richland, especially
during lower flow periods using the USGS stream gage would not provide accurate
discharge of the upstream withdrawal point (McCabe Park). A streamflow monitor would need to be installed closer and below
withdrawal point to accurately and precisely measure discharge (cfs), to determine
what is a safe amount of withdrawal, and to evaluate whether it is de
minimis, or not.
6) RCWA
believes that now is the time for long-term restoration planning for Richland
Creek to be implemented, and that the resource has not received adequate
consideration or ample protection. This public notice is timely to apply such a
plan and to provide an opportunity for community support to restore this water
resource to a more healthy state. There
are thousands of citizens who use the park resource for recreation (golf,
greenway and wildlife appreciation) who are unaware of the water-use activity occurring,
or who do not fully understand the adverse impact it has caused. Richland Creek is a well-known and
appreciated resource, which RCWA has discovered firsthand over the last five
years as we have worked to improve and restore the stream and educate about
stream and water conservation through our community outreach activities.
RCWA believes if the
natural flow were fully restored to Richland Creek, it could support fish and
aquatic life again and also provide more recreational uses for community
benefit and enjoyment. Because of Richland Creek's high visibility, restoration
of stream would also provide significant educational opportunities for the
public to better understand water and stream conservation, while watching the
stream transform from an impaired resource to a more natural state. Restoration of Richland could have immeasurable
and long-term benefits locally and regionally.
7) RCWA believes McCabe Park
could minimally increase its golfing fee and still remain an affordable golf
course for the average person.
Using the applicant’s application and Metro Water Services residential
fees, RCWA calculated the use of the larger and alternative water resource
(Cumberland River) to irrigate the golf course is affordable. Using
information that Metro Parks provided, RCWA calculated the use of Metro Water for
irrigation of McCabe Park Golf Course is feasible and would eliminate the need
to withdraw water from Richland Creek.
By adding only $1.00 to each 9-hole round of golf to the long-standing
fee at McCabe ($12 weekdays and $13 on weekends), there would be no significant
impact to the public golfing community, but instead, patrons would most likely
appreciate knowing they are restoring and saving a water resource with a
minimal increase in fee ($1.00 per golf round).
Metro Parks reported 85,379
rounds of golf were played at McCabe Park last year and an average of 78,000 rounds
per year over the past five years. RCWA used conservative numbers for
calculation and did not include other revenue, such as the cart and driving
range fees.
ANNUAL
EXPENSE ($81,000)
(Gallons
of water used annually) x (Cost per gallon of water from MWS) = Annual expense
to irrigate with Metro water
(27M
gallons) x ($.003) = $81,000
ANNUAL
REVENUE ($78,000)
(Additional
$1 charge per 9-hole round of golf) x (Average number of rounds annually)
($1) x
(78,000) = $78,000
The
additional expense to use Metro Water appears very feasible, and cost of
irrigation reasonably offset by the $1.00 fee increase per round of golf at
McCabe. Metro Parks should restore and
save Richland Creek with a fee increase to fully support the cost of its
facility’s operation.
A water conservation method could also be applied that would benefit McCabe Park
cost. Installation of moisture
sensors to determine irrigation need would conserve water and wasted water
fees. RCWA has observed on several occasions irrigation occurring during rain
events, which would be eliminated with installation of rain or moisture
sensors.
8) There is more public benefit by
restoration of Richland Creek than there is not restoring it to a natural
state. Besides fully supporting its classified uses, long lasting cultural
value could be gained that may provide economic benefit. Saving an urban stream
is no small feat, but it would attract visitors to a story, not often told — an
urban freshwater stream is restored. Richland Creek, once coined “the western edge of
civilization” could become a pride of place for locals as we move toward
Nashville’s goal of becoming the greenest city in the Southeast. The historical mentions of Richland
Creek in Nashville early development are not often recounted today, but it
could become a custom that would produce environmental, economic, educational
and cultural benefits.
Removal
of the McCabe Park impoundment could produce public safety benefit by reducing
flash flooding upstream and potentially provide more flood storage for the
Richland Creek watershed.
Collectively, these benefits could enthuse more stream conservation
planning for Nashville, and streams would be valued as a resource rather than
only a conduit for storm water. The benefits of restoration of Richland Creek
far outweigh the benefit from irrigation use.
—
END —
Prepared
by Monette Rebecca, on behalf of the RCWA Board of Directors and benefit to the
public good.
This document (RCWA
Position - PN #NRS12.236)
was prepared for public use and information and educational purposes.
RCWA Board of Directors
Monette
Rebecca (Founding President & Executive Director)
Catherine
Hayden (Secretary)
Joel
Covington (Treasurer)
Pat
Williams
Steve
Curnutte
Byron
Benbow
Elizabeth
Stein
Richland Creek
Watershed Alliance (RCWA) is community supported stream conservation group
focused exclusively on the environmental sustainability of the Richland Creek
watershed and preservation of its ecosystem.
RCWA is a recognized
501(c)(3) public charity (2010).
RCWA
P.O. Box 92016
Nashville,
TN 37209
rcwa@comcast.net
/ (615) 525.3379
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Cheers to Neighborly Branch Volunteers
![]() |
Working to save a forgotten urban stream |

On March 2, 2013 sixty volunteers gathered for coffee and to get supplies to help clean up Neighborly Branch, a tributary to Richland Creek. Sergeant Chick hosted the Richland Creek Watershed Alliance event, West Precinct Community Room and then joined the clean up effort (photo below). Citizens from the watershed and beyond participated on a cold, wet, flurry day and removed 6.5 tons of debris from 4 different stream areas, finding fun in the experience. Debris was trucked from 3 locations to a fourth for removal. The beauty of the urban stream was revealed and appreciated.-11.jpg)
75% of all the debris retrieved was taken for recycling. Volunteers reported spotting a white milky discharge entering from a smaller branch, cave salamanders running for cover, syringes, tires, all sorts of debris, and what happens when a stream is forgotten.
MANY THANKS to Our PARTNERS!
Tennesee Wildlife Resources Agency
Dan and Margaret Maddox Charitable Fund
Metro Public Works
West Police Precinct
![]() |
| A VIEW OF NEIGHBORLY BRANCH AFTER |
Labels:
Creek Clean Up,
Neighborly Branch,
RCWA,
Richland Creek,
volunteers
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Richland Creek restoration project transforming a creek and community



Volunteers from many communities in the watershed joined us to transform a stream side on Richland Creek Saturday — Sylvan Park, Whitland, Nations, Cherokee Park, West Meade, Charlotte Park, and Whitebridge neighbors planted 47 shrubs and plants. Representatives from Nashville State Comunity College, University School of Nashville and Cub Scout Troop 78 were there, and a couple of Messer Construction employees returned to help with Phase II. Special thanks to Gnome your Home gardener Janelle, who assisted with oreintating RCWA volunteers and planting. Learn more about Gnome at Home on facebook.
The two-phased restoration project engaged 70 community volunteers and introduced 16 native species back to the stream bank. The sixty plants and trees now there will surely attract more wildlife for visitors to enjoy. Seven shrub species (ninebark, arrowwood, virginia sweetspire, winterberry, inkberry, buttonbush and spicebush) were chosen for their relationship in nature and their adaptation in a riparian landscape, to help rebuild the biological diversity in our urban watershed.
Common benefits from riparian restoration are...
The two-phased restoration project engaged 70 community volunteers and introduced 16 native species back to the stream bank. The sixty plants and trees now there will surely attract more wildlife for visitors to enjoy. Seven shrub species (ninebark, arrowwood, virginia sweetspire, winterberry, inkberry, buttonbush and spicebush) were chosen for their relationship in nature and their adaptation in a riparian landscape, to help rebuild the biological diversity in our urban watershed.
Common benefits from riparian restoration are...
- Prevents stream bank erosion and excessive sedimentation
- Improves water quality — intercepts and filtrates pollutants from surface run-off and subsurface flow
- Enhances wildlife habitat
- Improves community aesthetics, air quality and heat island effect, and
- Overtime, contributes a canopy to control stream temperature
Relationships were built for long term sustainability....
This project is funded through Tennessee Environmental Council and Harpeth River Watershed Association with funds from The Dan & Margaret Maddox Charitable Fund and the Metro Flood Response Fund of The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee.
Loyal Brand Company and Blinker Lite provided provisions, and Mary Agee shared her photographic talents.
Thanks everyone!
Sunday, March 25, 2012
RCWA Celebrates Earth - April 14th

Join us April 14th for Phase II of our restoration project (get flyer) on Richland Creek. Let us know you are coming and bring a shovel, trowel or your favorite garden tool to add life and beauty to the stream side. Free coffee, t-shirts, refreshments and fun! Some of what we are planting shown.This project is funded through Tennessee Environmental Council and Harpeth River Watershed Association with funds from The Dan & Margaret Maddox Chairtable Fund and the Metro Flood Response Fund of The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee.
Loyal Brand Company donating coffee and Blinker Lite providing portalet.
Celebrate Earth restoring an urban stream.... Support the work of RCWA
Saturday, March 17, 2012
RCWA Partners for a Clean Up March 15th
This project is funded through Tennessee Environmental Council and Harpeth River Watershed Association with funds from The Dan & Margaret Maddox Charitable Fund and the Metro Flood Response Fund of The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee.
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Thanks to 27 Volunteers, 13 trees planted for Richland Creek
This project is fundered through Tennessee Environmental Council and Harpeth River Watershed Association with funds from the Dan and Margaret Maddox Charitable Fund and the Metro Flood Repsonse Fund of The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee.
Blinker Lite provided a portalet and Loyal Brand Company donated coffee for volunteers.
Thanks to our volunteers, sponsors and funders.
Richland Creek Watershed Alliance
Friday, February 24, 2012
Volunteer for the RCWA Stream Restoration Project March 3rd
Richland Creek Watershed Alliance is happy to be calling for volunteers to begin a stream restoration project for Richland Creek, Saturday March 3rd. Phase I of the project involves planting native trees to develop a canopy over the stream. RCWA wants to transform the area into a creek-friendly environment. Be part of the transformation... and let us know you plan to attend (rcwa@comcast.net).
Stream Restoration helps...
Stream Restoration helps...
~Prevent erosion
~Maintain a healthy aquatic temperature
~Improve water quality
~Enhance habitats; and
~Improve aesthetics, air quality and the heat island effect
This project is funded through Tennessee Environmental Council and Harpeth River Watershed Association with funds from The Dan & Margaret Maddox Charitable Fund and the Metro Flood Response Fund of The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee.
Project location is 0 Conway street.
Directions: turn onto Morrow Road off of Charlotte Avenue, and then take a left at the stop sign, onto Georgia Avenue. Project will be to your right, as you cross the bridge over the stream, and parking is along the side streets.
Email us... rcwa@comcast.net so we have an idea of how many volunteers to expect. Refreshments and free t-shirts available!
Bring a shovel if you can, good work shoes and dress for the weather. Registration begins at 8:30 am and we plan to be done by noon.
Pencil-in on your calendar Phase II restoration project date too —April 14th, when we install native shrubs and plants suited to stream environments and compliment the canopy we installed March 3rd.
Directions: turn onto Morrow Road off of Charlotte Avenue, and then take a left at the stop sign, onto Georgia Avenue. Project will be to your right, as you cross the bridge over the stream, and parking is along the side streets.
Email us... rcwa@comcast.net so we have an idea of how many volunteers to expect. Refreshments and free t-shirts available!
Bring a shovel if you can, good work shoes and dress for the weather. Registration begins at 8:30 am and we plan to be done by noon.
Pencil-in on your calendar Phase II restoration project date too —April 14th, when we install native shrubs and plants suited to stream environments and compliment the canopy we installed March 3rd.
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
RCWA End of Year Cheers
We have spent another year together focused on the important and mutual task of protecting and enhancing Richland Creek. Cheers and thank you for being there! In 2011 we have...
- Assisted TWRA with collecting winter invertebrate samples on Richland Creek
- Implemented baseline water quality sampling on 9 locations of Richland Creek
- Collaborated with Nashville Waterways Recovery Project — assessed 18 stream miles for flood debris removal
- Held 4 flood recovery clean ups on the Creek — removed 16 tons of debris, engaged 152 volunteers and cleaned up 13.5 acres
- Fielded numerous environmental concerns and citizens' inquires
- Conducted 2 water quality training sessions for citizen scientists
- Completed a targeted dissolved oxygen study with volunteers
- Advocated for long-term restoration of Richland Creek
- Filed an Item A Appeal with Board of Zoning to defend Creek from an outdated land use
- Gave lectures about the work of RCWA, the health of Richland Creek and water resource sustainability
- Produced a wall poster for the Flow 2011 national conference held in Nashville that focused on RCWA's work with Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency's flow study on Richland Creek
- Facilitated a riparian enhancement project at Nashville Big Picture School with Johnson Controls
- Networked with several environmental groups, community leaders and citizens for stream conservation
- Filed a Petition with the Chancery Court of Davidson County challenging the Item A Appeal decision
- Rebuilt the RCWA website
- Published information to keep stakeholders informed (newsletter, blog and emails)
- Created a new RCWA brochure, stream monitoring sampling plan and volunteer training manual
- Held our Annual Gathering — A Watershed is Common Ground
- Recruited 3 new Board members
- Grew the RCWA membership
The work of RCWA in 2011 was made possible by the assistance received from:
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency
World Wildlife Fund
The Middle Tennessee Community Foundation's Metro Disaster Response Fund
Barge Cauthen
Johnson Controls
Bone McAllester Norton
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings
Mayor's Office and Metro Government Departments: Water Services, Public Works, Parks and General Services
Tennessee Department of Transportation
Nashville's Business Community (Messer Construction, Tennessee Contractors Equipment, Blinker-Lite, Dose, Produce Place and Starbucks
Our Members and Volunteers
RCWA is very appreciative of our supportors, members and volunteers and in 2012, more possibilities can become a reality with your help. Please consider a year-end tax deductible gift to support the work of RCWA... to protect and enhance Richland Creek. Donate via Paypal or snail mail. We thank you.
Cheers to all for a great New Year!
RCWA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Labels:
Collaboration,
RCWA,
RCWA Update,
Watershed
Saturday, December 3, 2011
RCWA rebuilt website GOES LIVE
RCWA rebuilt their website — www.richlandcreekwatershedalliance.org with ICG Link. We have updated information about our work to improve the health and vitality of Richland Creek and will expand the site as we progress. The "Library," still under construction will provide access to our publications, photographs, videos and maps. You can still easily donate and join the organization from the "how you can help" page and "check the blog" from the website. RCWA is grateful to those that help accomplish this long process. Check it out.... and let us know what you think!
Labels:
RCWA,
Richland Creek
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Annual Gathering Highlights and Volunteer Cheers
![]() |
| Laura Lloyd |
| Holly and Barry Tashian |
The focus for the RCWA summer study was to evaluate if the use of creek water for irrigation during dry periods was inhibiting healthy dissolved oxygen levels from being maintained. Even though a longer and more costly study certainly would have provided more expansive data our results support Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency's comment — "an identifiable source of degradation is a Metro water withdrawal at Richland Creek Mile (RCM) 5.0 in the McCabe Park area."The first two days of the RCWA study found 8 out of 32 dissolved oxygen measurements (25%) fell below regulatory requirements — stream conditions were inhospitable to fish and aquatic life. Before the third and final test day it rained and consequently creek conditions quickly improved, indicating the previous poor conditions were due to the lack of water flow in the stream.
RCWA will work to compile a report about our work and present it to decisions makers. The volunteer spirit is alive and well and lets give our Citizen Scientists a big hand: Darlene Panvini, Holly and David Resuehr, Laurel Donahue, Jeff Recker, Steve Curnutte, Joel Covington, Mark Woods and Thomas Herbert and who represent several neighborhoods in our watershed.
Thanks and Cheers to Volunteers.....
Monette
The Richland Creek Watershed Alliance's stream monitoring program was made possible by assistance provided by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and World Wildlife Fund.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
RCWA Annual Gathering — A Watershed is Common Ground

![]() |
| www.tashianmusic.com |
Graciously hosted by Abintra Montessori School, this year our annual gathering will be blessed with music by Barry and Holly Tashian — "Their singing was so precise, so on the mark, that the room rang with vocal overtones" — The Los Angeles Times.
Join us for our presentation this year and to enjoy some food, wine, music and community-fun nestled in West Meade.
October 2, 2011 — 4-5:30 p.m.
A Watershed is Common Ground
Abintra Montessori School
914 Davidson Drive Nashville, TN 37205
Appetizers and wine — adult only event
Your (tax-deductible) support is appreciated!
Labels:
RCWA
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Volunteers Become Citizen Scientists
![]() |
Stay tuned for additional updates and photos in upcoming weeks.
The Richland Creek Watershed Alliance is appreciative for the assistance provided by the World Wildlife Fund, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Barge Cauthen & Associates.
To become a business sponsor contact us at rcwa@comcast.net.
Together, we do make a difference.
Labels:
Collaboration,
RCWA,
Stream monitoring,
volunteer activities,
Watershed,
wildlife
Thursday, August 18, 2011
RCWA's Board of Zoning Appeal Case Postponed Today
RCWA filed an Item A Appeal with Metro Nashville Codes Administration on June 30, 2011. The action was taken to defend Richland Creek from a nonconforming use car lot on Charlotte Pike that was resuming operations after they had abandoned the location for more than 24 months — a period of time longer than allowed by law for a new permit to come under the nonconforming provisions of the Metro Code.
The Board of Zoning of Appeals postponed hearing our case (August 18, 1 PM) because 3 of the 7 Board of Zoning Appeal Members could not make the hearing today and another had to recuse themselves. This meant for our case there would not be the required number of members (quorum) present.
RCWA's Item A Appeal (Case #2011-069) is now scheduled to be heard at 1 PM September 1st — at the next, regular scheduled hearing of the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA).
A link to the Board of Appeals Meeting Dockets is http://www.nashville.gov/codes/bza/dockets.asp.
A link to the Board of Appeals Meeting Dockets is http://www.nashville.gov/codes/bza/dockets.asp.
BZA Meetings are held
700 2nd Avenue South
Sonny West Conference Center
Nashville, TN
Labels:
Community Recommendations,
May 2010 Flood,
RCWA,
Watershed
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


-4.jpg)
-33.jpg)
-37.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)









